FLYING LESSONS for January 29, 2026

Topics this week include: >> The Big Four >> Slow down and do the right thing >> Positive pessimism

Download this report in a pdf

FLYING LESSONS uses recent mishap reports to consider what might have contributed to accidents, so you can make better decisions if you face similar circumstances.  In most cases design characteristics of a specific airplane have little direct bearing on the possible causes of aircraft accidents—but knowing how your airplane’s systems respond can make the difference in your success as the scenario unfolds. So apply these FLYING LESSONS to the specific airplane you fly.  Verify all technical information before applying it to your aircraft or operation, with manufacturers’ data and recommendations taking precedence.  You are pilot in command and are ultimately responsible for the decisions you make.     

FLYING LESSONS is an independent product of MASTERY FLIGHT TRAINING, INC.

Pursue Mastery of Flight®

This week’s LESSONS

When does an emergency not require instant action?

NASA WB-57F high altitude research aircraft—a very high-altitude version of an early 1950s jet bomber that itself was a modification of a British design—suffered a landing gear malfunction that the crew could not resolve in flight. A local news station documented the planned gear up landing at Houston, Texas. 

Click the image to view the video

When we train on emergencies we tend to focus on the Big Four: engine failure, engine fire, electrical fire and—in pressurized airplanes—rapid decompression. Each of these scenarios requires a swift, precise and correct response, with no time to look them up or reference a printed checklist. You must memorize the procedure steps and practice them frequently enough you know what to do when the need arises while under the heavy stress of the event.

Some of these responses drive the requirement for a follow-on procedure like emergency descent or maximum glide that itself demands a rapid response from memory.

But there is a whole class of emergencies that do not require an immediate, memorized response. Essentially anything that is not one of the Big Four not only gives you time to reference the emergency checklist, it demands that you take the time to do so. Like any other checklist action, this ensures you do everything you need to do and—just as important in an abnormal situation—you don’t do anything you should not do. You need to respond, but it must be a measured response—correct for the circumstances.

Think, for a moment, about electrical failure. If you detect a failure of your electrical charging system, the alternator or generator, there are scenarios where the rapid flip of a switch might cause more damage as possibly out-of-tolerance electrical flow is restored to vital equipment. Some avionics seem to be especially susceptible to damage from a spike in electrical power. 

Instead, upon noting the electrical issue open up the Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) or Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and locate the applicable checklist. This ensures you perform the actions that are correct for that specific airplane, and do nothing that might make matters worse. Remember to use the POH/AFM Supplement for any changes to the basic checklist as a result of modifications to the airplane.

Some POHs and AFMs make the distinction between Emergency and Abnormal Procedures checklists. For those that don’t, review your checklists and see which truly require an immediate, memorized response to save lives and limit damage. You’ll probably narrow it down to that type’s equivalent of the Big Four scenarios. For all others, know where the checklist is and what it directs you to do. But vow to take your time, reference the checklist and then perform the actions if you ever find yourself using the checklist for real. 

Not all situations are directly addressed by an emergency or abnormal checklist. In those cases do the best you can using your systems knowledge and elements of the checklists you do have. This is a case where it’s even more important to take your time to do things right. In most abnormal situations you have the opportunity to review the checklist several times before you begin to act. I expect the highly trained NASA test pilots in the WB-57 reviewed the Landing With Gear Retracted and Emergency Evacuation checklists several times before they lined up for final approach in front of the cameras at Houston.

Just because a situation isn’t a Big Four event or is served by an abnormal and not an emergency checklist does not mean the scenario itself is not an emergency. Work your way through it with a measured response. If the aircraft is no longer in conformance with its Type Certificate or applicable Supplemental Type Certificates then by nature the flight has entered an unairworthy and therefore emergency condition. Perform the correct actions, then declare an emergency to get the priority handling and ground responders you may need. 

Declaring an emergency also puts you in a mindset where you get the aircraft on the ground as soon as safely possible and helps you fight the temptation to press on in an unairworthy aircraft.

Even if the situation is straightforward, take your time and use the checklist. This is an advanced version of the World War II instructional advice to “wind the clock” (a mechanical clock on the instrument panel in that era) as a way of slowing down and doing the right thing.

Questions? Comments? Supportable opinions? Let us know at [email protected]

Debrief

Readers write about recent LESSONS

Highly experienced tailwheel and aerobatic instructor and son-of-a-Spitfire-pilot reader Anthony Johnstone writes about last week’s LESSONS:

Thanks for reinforcing the LESSON to employ “positive pessimism” with the added “punch” or your experience, Tony.

Our frequent Debriefer/student pilot [I think still a student pilot] who wishes to remain anonymous also wrote:

Great wisdom from a low-time pilot. Thank you, anonymous.

More to say? Let us learn from you, at [email protected].

Share safer skies. Forward FLYING LESSONS to a friend

Please help cover the ongoing costs of providing FLYING LESSONS through this secure PayPal donations link. Or send a check made out to Mastery Flight Training, Inc. at 247 Tiffany Street, Rose Hill, Kansas USA 67133. Thank you, generous supporters.

Thank you to our regular monthly financial contributors:

Thank you to these 2026 donors:

Thanks also to these donors in 2025:

Pursue Mastery of Flight®

Thomas P. Turner, M.S. Aviation Safety 

Flight Instructor Hall of Fame Inductee

2021 Jack Eggspuehler Service Award winner

2010 National FAA Safety Team Representative of the Year 

2008 FAA Central Region CFI of the Year

FLYING LESSONS is ©2026 Mastery Flight Training, Inc.  For more information see www.thomaspturner.com. For reprint permission or other questions contact [email protected].  

Disclaimer

FLYING LESSONS uses recent mishap reports to consider what might have contributed to accidents, so you can make better decisions if you face similar circumstances. In most cases design characteristics of a specific airplane have little direct bearing on the possible causes of aircraft accidents—but knowing how your airplane’s systems respond can make the difference in your success as the scenario unfolds. Apply these FLYING LESSONS to the specific airplane you fly.

Verify all technical information before applying it to your aircraft or operation, with manufacturers’ data and recommendations taking precedence. You are pilot in command, and are ultimately responsible for the decisions you make.