FLYING LESSONS for November 16, 2023

A big part of flying safety is workload management. You may have already noticed I’m a day late with FLYING LESSONS this week. With that in mind—and more importantly, because of great reader insights—let’s go directly to this week’s Debrief.

Questions? Comments? Supportable opinions? Let us know at [email protected]

Debrief: 

Readers write about recent FLYING LESSONS:

Reader/instructor Alan David writes:

The NTSB’s final report (in a year or so) should answer more questions about the specifics of this crash. But chances are it will not teach us many more LESSONS we can’t already glean now. I’ve touched on possible considerations many times in past LESSONS and elsewhere, including: 

  • In an off-airport landing, the greatest chance of survival comes when you touch down WUSS: wings level, under control at the slowest safe speed
  • The “turnback maneuver” after engine failure shortly after takeoff, even if recently practiced by a highest capable pilot, presents a far lower chance of survival than landing WUSS straight ahead even into obstacles.
  • The lack of good options roughly straight ahead does not by itself suddenly make attempting to turn back a good idea.  
  • According to Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) research I’ve cited in FLYING LESSONS many times, partial power loss is three times as likely to have resulted in an accident report than total power loss historically…and the less glaringly obvious indications of partial power loss as compared to total engine failure introduces confusion that will negatively impact the pilot’s response.
  • If an engine anomaly occurs before takeoff, investigate it thoroughly, and don’t try to take off again until the reason is determined and corrected.
  • As discussed in my October 26 LESSONSset takeoff targets for every departure, then monitor actual performance against these targets. If the aircraft fails to attain a target, abort. 
  • In a retractable gear airplane, the default response to a power-off or off-airport landing should be a gear up landing. In most RG airplanes at their Best Glide speed extending landing gear adds about 500 feet per minute to the gear-up rate of descent. As I’ve noted many times over the years, it’s common when an engine failure occurs in an RG airplane that the airplane either stalls or descends into obstacles a quarter mile or less from the pilot’s apparent intended landing spot. The landing gear is usually down when this occurs. I suspect in such cases the pilot has set up a glide that is going to work, then decides to extend the wheels. As soon as the gear leaves the wheel wheels and drag increases, what might have been a successful WUSS touchdown will no longer work. Leave the gear up unless you are high and very close to touchdownSliding it on under control is a very acceptable outcome.
  • If it can happen to someone like Richard McSpadden, it can happen to anyone. We all need to exercise superior judgment on every flight, looking for signs of trouble and acting before we find ourselves needing superior skill.

I’m confident from my frequent talks with Richard McSpadden, and his many articles and videos I’ve read and watched, that he would have wanted us all to learn these LESSONS and act on them in all our flying. It’s incredibly tragic that it took the Lake Placid crash to remind us, yet again, that the circumstances of most aircraft accidents are repetitive and predictable.

In last week’s Debrief I replied to a comment from reader Damon Overboe, who wrote about “my” 50/70 Rule as a takeoff target. I’d written:

This week Damon continues:

I agree, many (otherwise) outstanding instructors and resources seem to get the 50/70 rule wrong. For example, Bold Method’s entry says:

The common error is stating that the rule compares airspeed to runway length. In reality, the rule compares airspeed to computed takeoff distance. You should be at 70% of your liftoff speed by the time you are 50% of the way to your liftoff point. If not, abort. The comparison is an indirect measure of power development (and tire pressure, runway condition and contamination and other environmental factors) that might rob the airplane of takeoff performance and be detectable by less-than-expected takeoff ground roll distance.

More to say? Let us learn from you, at [email protected]


Share safer skies. Forward FLYING LESSONS to a friend

From www.aopa.org:

Rebranded Report Highlights Improved Accident Rate

AOPA this week has released its 33rd Air Safety Institute Accident Report. The 33rd AOPA Air Safety Institute Accident Report (until now honoring the legacy of Joseph T. Nall) has been renamed in honor and memory of Richard McSpadden. Richard’s work focused on reaching audiences with relevant, timely, and engaging content. His tireless efforts to improve aviation safety helped envision the current iteration of this report, which offers users a near real-time analysis of general aviation accidents. The data are updated on a rolling 30-day cycle, with access to analysis going back as far as 2008 and data trends projected well into 2023.

Executive summaries in the report note a decrease in overall accident rates despite an increase in the actual number of total and fatal accidents mitigated by a large increase in flight activity following 2020. AOPA notes that accident rates in non-commercial fixed-wing, commercial fixed-wing, and commercial helicopters all fell, while non-commercial helicopter rates rose. Stall/loss-of-control events continue to be the leading causal factor and weather-related accidents remain highly lethal. These accident causes—related to pilot decision-making and proficiency—help inform the industry, including the AOPA Air Safety Institute, where further education and training are needed to improve aviation safety.

Read the Richard G. McSpadden Report here. I’ll be looking into the report and its conclusions and may have my own commentary in future editions of FLYING LESSONS Weekly.


Please help cover the ongoing costs of providing FLYING LESSONS through this

secure PayPal donations link. Or send a check made out to Mastery Flight Training, Inc. at 247 Tiffany Street, Rose Hill, Kansas USA 67133. Thank you, generous supporters. 

Special thanks to these donors for helping with the Mastery Flight Training website rebuild and beyond:

Thanks to our regular monthly financial contributors:


Thomas P. Turner, M.S. Aviation Safety 

Flight Instructor Hall of Fame Inductee

2021 Jack Eggspuehler Service Award winner

2010 National FAA Safety Team Representative of the Year 

2008 FAA Central Region CFI of the Year

Three-time Master CFI

FLYING LESSONS is ©2023 Mastery Flight Training, Inc.  For more information see www.thomaspturner.com. For reprint permission or other questions contact [email protected].  

Disclaimer

FLYING LESSONS uses recent mishap reports to consider what might have contributed to accidents, so you can make better decisions if you face similar circumstances. In most cases design characteristics of a specific airplane have little direct bearing on the possible causes of aircraft accidents—but knowing how your airplane’s systems respond can make the difference in your success as the scenario unfolds. Apply these FLYING LESSONS to the specific airplane you fly.

Verify all technical information before applying it to your aircraft or operation, with manufacturers’ data and recommendations taking precedence. You are pilot in command, and are ultimately responsible for the decisions you make.