FLYING LESSONS for December 25, 2025

Topics this week include: >> Asteroid down >> Not just checking a box >> Postflight postbrief

This week’s LESSONS

I was in the right seat of a G36 Bonanza a couple of weeks ago. The young corporate pilot, employed by the owners of a multistate network of building supplies stores (one of the owners a past Bonanza student of mine as well) was doing a masterful job as I guided him through experiencing some of the type-specific handling and tendencies of the airplane. 

We had completed some unusual attitude recoveries toward the pilot’s Instrument Proficiency Check (IPC) requirements. That set us up at 4000 feet, about 2500 feet above ground level, maybe 10 miles from the Newton, Kansas airport (KEWK). Next up on today’s LESSON plan was an extended simulated engine-out glide to a landing using an engine-friendly technique that I explain as a single-engine equivalent of simulated zero thrust in a twin. So we started back toward the airport level at 4000 feet.

Several training airplanes were maneuvering in the area, most below us—a couple of Pipers flying under the callsign Lark from Hesston College’s small Newton-based professional pilot program, some Cessnas with N-numbers I recognized from the larger Textron Aviation Flying Club up from Beech Field, and maybe a 172 or two from the Wichita Tech program from my home airport at Wichita Jabara were taking advantage of the unusually nice late December weather. I kept my eyes out the windows with frequent scans of the ADS-B traffic display, keenly aware of my primary responsibility as a flight instructorto assure the safe outcome of the flight.

Then a very calm voice came over the KEWK CTAF: 

There was no panic, the speech was smooth and unelevated, it sounded like any other routine call entering or in the pattern. I’d been watching one nearby ADS-B triangle—being in high school and college in the video arcade era of the late 1970s and early 1980s, I can’t scan ADS-B without thinking about the game Asteroids—and saw that it was descending quickly relative to us in a tight turn. I pointed it out to my student about the same time he said he thought he saw it out his side of the airplane, 10 o’clock low. I radioed: 

“Engine out airplane at Newton, Nxxxx will call Approach and have them send first responders your way.”

My student asked and I agreed to circle in the area at our current altitude. One or two of the trainers below us were angling toward the emergency airplane on ADS-B, lower than us. I swapped COMM frequencies to Approach and checked in: “Wichita Approach, Bonanza xxxx 10 east of Newton, request.” The controller came right back with a squawk code and 

I input the code as I radioed: “Nxxxx is 10 miles of Newton, there’s a Piper less than a mile south of my position reported engine out and landing in a field. Request you contact emergency services and send them toward my position.” 

My customer, doing a very good job instinctively flying a turn around a point, pointed to his left and said he just saw the airplane touch down in a field and it looks like it landed okay. I saw it too, rectangular white wings in the very middle of a large, brown open field. I reported same to Approach and told them we were orbiting where the rescue forces need to be. Continuing to monitor Approach, I switched back to transmit on CTAF and called, “Emergency airplane in a field at Newton, if you’re still on frequency Approach is sending first responders your way.”

Approach then asked me if I had an address or names of the roads at the nearest intersection, but it was dirt roads 40 miles from my home and I had no idea. However, about that time one of the other airplanes in the area came up on Approach and gave them a couple of county road numbers. 

On about our third turn around the downed airplane my student and I saw a white pickup truck driving across the field toward the airplane. The Piper appeared upright and, as best we could tell, undamaged. Although my client and I felt a bit bad for leaving the scene, there was nothing more we could do. So I told the pilot to hit “Direct To” KEWK and we proceeded to practice our own simulated engine failure to a landing with a heightened sense that we were not just checking off another box on a recurrent training syllabus.

From a social media post showing the downed Piper

We don’t yet know why the Piper’s engine failed. No one was hurt and there was no reported damage, so there will be no public investigation so we’ll probably never know. 

We do know that whatever the cause, in the moments that followed engine failure the instructor—I’ve since learned this was a dual instructional flight not involving any of the training organizations I mentioned earlier—and his student (I assume the male-sounding voice I heard on the radio was the CFI) flew the airplane and aimed somewhere that gave them their best chances of survival, then as best I can tell touched down wings level, under control at the slowest safe speed. I see from the social media photo that the flaps are up, requiring a little extra speed—and energy to absorb after landing—but that may have been a conscious choice necessary to make it to the excellent-looking choice of an off-airport landing spot. 

In all there’s nothing as an external observer to criticize about how the emergency was handled from failure to recovery, and a lot about which to commend the pilot and instructor.  What an amazing LESSON the student aboard that Piper learned to carry through a career of flying.

See, some of these LESSONS are happy endings. Merry Christmas to readers who observe the holiday, and safe, masterful flying to all.

Questions? Comments? Supportable opinions? Let us know at [email protected]

Debrief

Readers write about recent LESSONS

Reader Karl Kleiderer writes about last week’s LESSONS on post-flight inspections:

Great example, Karl. Thank you.

Frequent Debriefer Arthur Utay adds:

Excellent, Art. I didn’t touch on the benefits of conducting a postflight inspection in an environment where multiple pilots fly an aircraft and some, without pride of ownership, may not be as diligent reporting discrepancies. Thank you.

Reader Al Chaker continues:

I agree with you, Al. I meant that passage as a way to remove objections to someone who does not watch his/her airplane being fueled. Obviously I missed that mark.

Reader/instructor Dave Dewhirst continues our Debrief that started with a discussion on multiengine training:

I say something very similar about hot starts on fuel-injected Continental engines: if you put 20 flight instructors in a room they’ll come up with 23 different hot start procedures, and most will work at least some of the time. I’m a “guy from Wichita” too and preface a lot of my teaching with “use what you like, modify what you want and throw away the rest.” I really appreciate your insights and experience, Dave.

More to say? Let us learn from you, at [email protected]

Please help cover the ongoing costs of providing FLYING LESSONS through this secure PayPal donations link. Or send a check made out to Mastery Flight Training, Inc. at 247 Tiffany Street, Rose Hill, Kansas USA 67133. Thank you, generous supporters.

Thank you, Andy, for your comments and your continued financial support of FLYING LESSONS Weekly.

Thank you to everyone listed below who have made one-, two- or even three-time donations to help cover the costs of hosting and delivering the weekly reports, and especially the many readers who have subscribed with a monthly automatic contribution. 

Has what you’ve learned in FLYING LESSONS this year been worth it to you? How many hours of “dual” have you received from the weekly reports? If you’ve learned at least as much as you do in an hour of flight instruction please consider donating the amount you’d pay your flight instructor for just one hour of her/his time. Or send a check made out to Mastery Flight Training, Inc. at 247 Tiffany Street, Rose Hill, Kansas USA 67133. 

I only make this appeal two weeks each year. Please consider donating what you’d pay for just one hour of flight instruction, to help me cover the costs of hosting, delivering and improving FLYING LESSONS Weekly. If that’s more than you think it’s been worth, any amount is greatly appreciated.

Thank you to our regular monthly financial contributors:

Thanks also to these donors in 2025:

Thomas P. Turner, M.S. Aviation Safety 

Flight Instructor Hall of Fame Inductee

2021 Jack Eggspuehler Service Award winner

2010 National FAA Safety Team Representative of the Year 

2008 FAA Central Region CFI of the Year

FLYING LESSONS is ©2025 Mastery Flight Training, Inc.  For more information see www.thomaspturner.com. For reprint permission or other questions contact [email protected].  

Disclaimer

FLYING LESSONS uses recent mishap reports to consider what might have contributed to accidents, so you can make better decisions if you face similar circumstances. In most cases design characteristics of a specific airplane have little direct bearing on the possible causes of aircraft accidents—but knowing how your airplane’s systems respond can make the difference in your success as the scenario unfolds. Apply these FLYING LESSONS to the specific airplane you fly.

Verify all technical information before applying it to your aircraft or operation, with manufacturers’ data and recommendations taking precedence. You are pilot in command, and are ultimately responsible for the decisions you make.